<span style="white-space: normal;">壁面结构对三维可压缩气泡群影响的数值模拟研究</span>

WANG Jincheng; GUAN Hui; WEI Zhijun; WU Chuijie

doi:10.21656/1000-0887.420041

Volume 43 Issue 1

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Applied Mathematics and Mechanics > 2022 > 43(1): 49-62

WANG Jincheng, GUAN Hui, WEI Zhijun, WU Chuijie. 壁面结构对三维可压缩气泡群影响的数值模拟研究[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 49-62. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.420041

Citation:

PDF( 20508 KB)

壁面结构对三维可压缩气泡群影响的数值模拟研究

doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.420041

1.
大连理工大学航空航天学院，辽宁大连 116024
2.
国防科技大学气象海洋学院，长沙 410073
3.
大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室，辽宁大连 116024

Received Date: 2021-02-20
Rev Recd Date: 2021-05-09
Publish Date: 2022-01-01

Abstract

Abstract

基于流体体积(VOF)法追踪自由液面，研究了壁面结构对三维可压缩气泡群流动的影响。通过在待测壁面上设置不同形状的壁面结构（长方体、椭球体和圆锥体）并改变它们各自的几何参数（位置和长度），来研究壁面结构对壁面附近的气泡群流动的影响，该影响表现为气泡群对壁面的空间平均压力。研究发现，壁面结构对气泡群的拓扑结构的影响会造成壁面压力的变化，其中长方体壁面结构降低壁面平均压力的效果最好，且通过适当调整该结构的位置和长度，能使壁面的压力脉动现象消失。
- 可压缩两相流,
- 气泡与壁面结构间耦合作用,
- 流体体积法

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	CAPART H, YOUNG D L. Formation of a jump by the dam-break wave over a granular bed[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 372: 165-187. doi: 10.1017/S0022112098002250
[2]	PRITCHARD D, HOGG A J. On sediment transport under dam-break flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 473: 265-274. doi: 10.1017/S0022112002002550
[3]	LOBOVSKÝ L, BOTIA-VERA E, CASTELLANA F, et al. Experimental investigation of dynamic pressure loads during dam break[J]. Journal of Fluids & Structures, 2014, 48: 407-434.
[4]	MARTIN J C, MOYCE W J. Part Ⅳ: an experimental study of the collapse of liquid columns on a rigid horizontal plane philosophical[J]. Transactions of the Royal Society of London(Series A): Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1952, 244: 312-324.
[5]	KOSHIZUKA S, OKA Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996, 123: 421-434. doi: 10.13182/NSE96-A24205
[6]	CRUCHAGA M A, CELENTANO D J, TEZDUYAR T E. Collapse of a liquid column: numerical simulation and experimental validation[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 39: 453-476. doi: 10.1007/s00466-006-0043-z
[7]	HU C, SUEYOSHI M. Numerical simulation and experiment on dam break problem[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2010, 9: 109-114. doi: 10.1007/s11804-010-9075-z
[8]	COLAGROSSI A, LANDRINI M. Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 191: 448-475. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00324-3
[9]	MA Z H, CAUSON D M, QIAN L, et al. A compressible multiphase flow model for violent aerated wave impact problems[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 2014, 470: 1-25.
[10]	SHIN S. Simulation of compressibility of entrapped air in an incompressible free surface flow using a pressure-based method for unified equations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2020, 92: 1274-1289. doi: 10.1002/fld.4827
[11]	JANÍK P, HYHLÍK T. Pressure evaluation during dam break using weakly compressible SPH[J]. The European Physical Journal Conferences, 2019, 213: 02030. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201921302030
[12]	WANG L, JIANG Q, ZHANG C, et al. Improvements of MPS for reducing numerical pressure oscillation in the dam break simulation[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2018, 29(1): 89-99.
[13]	WANG X G, LUO C, GU Z B. Collapse simulation of a cavitation bubble near a rigid boundary[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2015, 43(5): 512-516.
[14]	LI S, ZHANG A M, HAN R, et al. Experimental and numerical study on bubble-sphere interaction near a rigid wall[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29(9): 092102. doi: 10.1063/1.4993800
[15]	BEIG S A, ABOULHASANZADEH B, JOHNSEN E. Temperatures produced by inertially collapsing bubbles near rigid surfaces[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 852: 102-125.
[16]	OpenCFD Ltd. OpenFOAM, the Open Source CFD Toolbox, User’s Guide[M]. Free Software Foundation, Inc, 2016.
[17]	NOH W F, WOODWARD P. SLIC (simple line interface calculation)[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Enschede: Twente University, 1976: 330-340.
[18]	WELLER H G. A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow: TR/HGW/04[R]. Technical Report. OpenCFD Ltd, 2008.
[19]	FERZIGER J, PERIC M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
[20]	ISSA R I. Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1986, 62(1): 40-65. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-9
[21]	JASAK H, WELLER H G. Interface tracking capabilities of the inter-gamma differencing scheme[R]. London: Imperial College, University of London, 1995.
[22]	GUAN H, WANG J C, WEI Z J, et al. Numerical analysis of the interaction of 3D compressible bubble clusters[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 2019, 40(8): 1181-1196. doi: 10.1007/s10483-019-2509-6
[23]	KRÖNINGER D A. Particle-tracking-velocimetry-messungen an kollabierenden kavitationsblasen[D]. PhD Thesis. Göttingen: Georg-August Universität, 2008.